Issues : Omitted correction of an analogous place
|
b. 66-67
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we suggest prolonging the e1 quaver in bar 66 to the next bar, like Chopin marked it – probably during the last phase of proofreading – in analogous bars 294-295. Taking into account the fact that this insignificant detail of accompaniment appears two times in total a few minutes apart, we consider inadvertence to be a more likely reason for discrepancies in the notation of analogous bars than an intention to differentiate between those places. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 500-503
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, one can see traces of proofreading of the slurs in bars 501-503 – originally, each of those bars was encompassed with a separate slur. If we take into account that Chopin combined also the slurs over bars 496-497, one can ponder whether leaving a musically unjustified division of the slur between bars 500-501 was intentional. It is likely that the proofreading was supposed to concern this place too, yet it was inaccurately implemented. category imprint: Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
